The popular press have made much recently of the fact that some of the women who develop breast or ovarian cancers have an inherited susceptibility to these diseases.
Anyone who has read these articles might have seen BRCA1 and BRCA2 mentioned as the genes which have mutated and so confer this increased cancer risk. What people really need to know is how this is likely to affect them.
Are you at increased risk of breast or ovarian cancer? If so, are you likely to have either of these mutated genes? Should you be tested? And, perhaps most importantly, if you do test positive, what can you do about your increased risk? We don't yet have answers to all these questions, but this article should help clarify some of the issues surrounding genetic testing for cancer.
What are BRCA1 and BRCA2?
Up to 10 percent of breast cancers are thought to arise from an inherited predisposition to the disease. Mutations in two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, account for most of these cases, although there are other genes associated with hereditary breast cancer.
A simple blood test can now be used to detect mutations in these genes. How is it that these mutations increase susceptibility to cancer?
BRCA1 has been localised to chromosome 17q and BRCA2 to chromosome 13q. Both genes apparently function as tumour suppressor genes. So individuals who inherit a mutated (changed) copy of these genes which no longer have these tumour suppressing properties, do not have the physiological ability to prevent the uncontrolled growth of cancer. The exact mechanism of action of these two genes, and exactly how mutated copies lead to breast and ovarian cancer, is not clear. BRCA1 apparently suppresses the growth of ovarian and breast cancer lines, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 seem to take part in the mechanism of DNA production and repair.
How is your risk of cancer increased by carrying one of these gene mutations?
We know that most hereditary breast cancers are associated with mutations to BRCA1 and BRCA2. The information on the risks of cancer associated with carrying these genes has been derived from studies of families in which many female members have developed breast and ovarian cancers at an early age.
Women inheriting a BRCA1 mutation have a 55 to 85 percent risk of developing breast cancer, compared with a 12.5 percent risk in the general population. They also seem to develop the cancer at an earlier age. More than 50 percent of carriers are diagnosed before the age of 50. They also have a much greater chance of developing cancer in the other breast later in life. Early studies suggest that breast-conserving surgery may not be a good option for these women since there seems to be a higher risk of developing cancer in the remaining part of the breast.
Women with BRCA1 mutations also have an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer; 15 to 60 percent by the age of 70, against 1 to 2 percent generally. BRCA1 mutation carriers who have developed breast cancer have a 44 percent chance of ovarian cancer by the age of 70. The risk is only 3 percent in those women who have sporadic, non-inherited, breast cancer.
There may be other cancers associated with BRCA1 mutations. It seems that men carrying these mutations have an increased risk of prostate cancer, although there are as yet no figures on the increased risk in comparison with the general population. There may be an association with colorectal cancer, but this is still being studied.
BRCA2 mutations are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in men as well as women. The risk in women carrying mutations is between 55 and 85 percent, while that in men rises to about 6 percent. Breast cancer in men is very rare, with only 1600 cases diagnosed every year in America.
There is not as strong an association between ovarian cancer and BRCA2 mutations as there is between this cancer and BRCA1 mutations. However, the risk is still slightly higher than that in the general population at 15 to 27 percent. Prostate cancer also appears to be associated with BRCA2 mutations, and some studies have suggested a link with pancreatic cancer.
Who should be tested?
Most cases of breast cancer are sporadic, that is, not inherited. So how do you know if you should think about testing?
In order to determine whether you should be tested your specialist will take an extensive family history, looking for the following features:
What do the test results mean?
Before testing, all patients must insist on full counselling by an experienced genetic counsellor.
There is more than one possible outcome to testing, including an "inconclusive" outcome. What are these?
With a combination of a strong family history and a true positive result, the rest of the family, including more distant relatives such as aunts and cousins, will be offered testing. It is important that each subsequent family member offered testing is fully counselled by an experienced genetic counsellor.
What do we do with the results?
In all medical situations investigations should only ever be carried out if they are going to make a difference to managing the patient. At present we are in the situation where we are able to test for these mutations which we know confer an increased risk of certain cancers, but we cannot yet offer a definitive management program having found them. However, "yet" is the operative word, and there is plenty of research being carried out on screening and prevention which should mean that we will be able to offer management alternatives to women with these mutations very soon.
At the moment there are certain general measures which should make a difference to outcome in women who are found to have mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Obviously, any woman with these mutations will increase her surveillance for breast cancer with regular breast self-examination and mammograms.
Some women may consider removal of both breast and ovaries to decrease the risk of cancer, although it is important to recognise that even this does not decrease the risk of cancer to zero.
Although the current evidence is not conclusive, it would seem that Tamoxifen and Raloxifene may protect against breast cancer in women without the BRCA1/2 mutations. Studies are currently being carried out to determine whether this effect is seen in women carrying the mutations.
The effects of long-term use of the oral contraceptive pill in women carrying the BRCA1/2 mutations is not clear. In healthy women long-term use of the oral contraceptive pill is associated with a decreased risk of ovarian cancer, and overall, does not increase the risk of breast cancer. However, a study of Ashkenazi Jewish women suggests that women carrying BRCA1/2 mutations may have an increased risk of breast cancer associated with long-term use of the pill. However, the sample size of this study was small and more work needs to be done before making conclusive statements.
There is little or no information on the risks of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in women with these mutations. Since women carrying BRCA1/2 mutations may consider having their ovaries removed at an early age to prevent them from developing ovarian cancer, this is a pertinent problem. In the general population there may be some evidence of a slightly increased risk of breast cancer with HRT use. However, some people believe that HRT can be used in BRCA1/2 carriers who have had prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy. Larger studies are currently underway to determine whether risks for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2 carriers are affected by using HRT.
The other major problem with testing comes when the insurance companies start thinking about using it to determine risks in those buying life-insurance. In any application for life-insurance a family history of cancer would become apparent, since the state of health and cause of death of siblings and parents is required.
Should insurance companies then be able to insist on testing for these mutations? Up to 45 percent of female carriers never develop cancer. Should they be penalised for carrying a mutated gene which may have no effect on their longevity? Only 10 percent of breast and ovarian cancer is hereditary anyway, so would insuring these people really make a lot of difference to the financial burden carried by the insurers?
With the increasing number of genetic tests available these are questions which are being asked by consumers and the insurance industry alike. At present we have no answers, but it is up to consumers to keep a close watch on what is happening in the industry to prevent the potential for unfair practice.